
In a fine blog
post, Fleep Tuque chronicles the sometimes sad limitations of both first and second life. People have suggested that blogging may be in decline when faced with microblogging's opportunities for immediacy and community. Fleep's post, among many others from the SL community of late, reminds us why this should not be allowed to happen.
On a purely technical level, Fleep complains:
I can’t show a flash or .wmv movie in Second Life, can’t collaboratively access webpages and documents with others easily, and it takes forever and 50 steps to do something as simple as making a prim clickable to launch a webpage.
There is some truth in what she says but, on the recommendation of Carol and Ledoof, I have at last tried Damani's
viewer (on left of image), not because it smoooths all the bumps in HTML-on-a-prim (HOAP) but in the expectation that it at least simplifies matters a little (as per Fleep's needs). On balance, I think it does.
One good point is that the viewer is trivial to setup and use. It is also commendably flexible, being able to read URLs from chat, bookmarks or a notecard. On the downside, it still can't follow links (the Daden and SLOODLE browsers work round this SL limitation) or scroll.
By way of compensation, it provides a direct link to chat-mediated Google search (shown in the image), integrated viewing of YouTube videos (no idea whether this uses native mp4 or translated mp3 files), listening to Shoutcast streams, and display of still images. Most importantly, the experience is touch-based and slick, at least once you realise the Damani logo at the bottom right returns you to the main menu! Thereafter it is simply a matter of using the arrow keys to navigate menus, entering search terms in chat when prompted.
I've addressed the issue of collaborative authoring
previously and have nothing new to add (all previous posts tagged
HOAP). However, the take-home message from the Damani product is that a smooth user experience is probably more important than heavyweight functionality. In that regard, a customised
EtherPad would have much to commend it.
That said, overall I am still slightly perplexed by the Linden roadmap for web integration. The private sim-based and presumably heavyweight
Immersive Workspaces version 2.0 product developed with Rivers Run Red hasn't clarified matters thus far. The collaborative authoring, I understand, is not inworld/immersive - I could be wrong but the demo sim (in the map above) is not accessible. Given the educational discount mentioned on the pre-Christmas Metanomics show, the absence of any substantive follow-up on the SLED list (tours, for example) is surprising.
While embedding the 3D browser in a web page is one
option, I prefer the current inworld immersive experience with the opportunity to popup an integrated media browser when necessary (something Damani should add, by the way). However, while the integrated browser supports hyperlinks and scrolling, it doesn't get round the problems of Flash or Java other than via launch of a fully external browser.
Predictions as to the future seem to be largely a matter of speculation and one has to appreciate that web access and collaborative authoring are not priority issues for most gamers and SL residents apart from RL business and education.
It seemed at one stage that the integrated client would swap to WebKit with the work out-sourced in part to
Nuanti. However, it is very unclear (to me, at least) how this is progressing and in the resulting vacuum the open source activity in the associated (and somewhat spammed) Google Groups seems to be leaning towards solutions based on the Google implementation of WebKit (Chromium) that underpins their new browser, Chrome. However, at the present time there is no support for Linux or the Mac which suggests additional delays.
As Fleep implies, this is a significant issue not only for individuals but also at enterprise level where I suspect IT directors can be expected to look with suspicion on any platform without a credible web interface.